Skip to main content

You Purchase it, You Pay for it

A radical concept: if you take out a loan, you have to pay it off. 

Well, it’s a radical concept to the far-left presidential candidates anyway. Bernie Sanders came out swinging this morning on Twitter, arguing that all 1.6 trillion dollars of student debt in the U.S. should be forgiven.

One of my personal favorites:
 There's quite a bit to unpack in this gem of a tweet, so let's dig right into it.

Yes, I am free. I'm free even if I graduate with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. The same way that I'm free when I go to the grocery store and buy a candy bar for a dollar. When I make purchases by my own free-will, by definition, I am free. Even if those purchases put me in a huge amount of debt. 

 When you are free, you have the ability to make decisions for yourself. You don't have freedom from the consequences of those actions.

I am still free even if my debt prevents me from "pursuing my dream". When you voluntarily incur a debt, you are responsible for the consequences that accompany the payment of that debt.

Additionally, college is supposed to be a financial investment. Those with the "dream" of becoming doctors pay the high price tag for medical school knowing that their investment will be profitable and they will easily be able to pay off their debt. If you "don't make enough to cover student loan payments", maybe you should have thought about that before you made a poor investment by going to a university that you cannot afford and majoring in a subject that doesn't pay.

I will graduate with my bachelor's with no debt. I chose to attend a cheap university and got the vast majority of my tuition and room and board paid for via scholarships, even if it meant that I wouldn't be attending my "dream school". Because of this, it irks me when college students act as if they had no option other than to attend a university that cost them $200,000+. A significant portion of college students made financially responsible decisions similar to mine. Should students like this be punished and forced to subsidize the education of those who made a careless investment?

Bernie closes out this masterpiece of a tweet by proclaiming, "there is no freedom without economic freedom". This seems ironic coming from a socialist, but when Bernie says economic freedom he isn't talking about the freedom to use the products of your labor however you please. He means freedom from the consequences of your actions. A type of freedom that is only possible if the government interferes with somebody else's actual economic freedom by forcing them to use their property to pay for a debt that they didn't sign on to.

If you purchased it, pay for it. It's not that complicated.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Defining a Flag, Defining a Nation

Earlier this week, Nike canceled the release of a patriotic pair of shoes decorated with the Betsy Ross flag. This decision was the result of Colin Kaepernick, a Nike brand ambassador, informing the company that he and others found the shoe offensive, due to the inclusion of the Betsy Ross flag which was flown during the time of slavery in the United States. Kaepernick claimed that several racist groups had co-opted the flag, using it as a way to honor a time where slavery was commonplace.  Amid the controversy surrounding Nike's decision, the obvious question emerged: Is the Betsy Ross flag really a symbol of racism?  If you asked Colin Kaepernick, the answer would be a resounding "yes". This flag flew over a country where African-Americans were considered to be less than human and were owned as property.  The Betsy Ross flag is a symbol of the evils that the United States participated in at the time that it was flown.  While I understand this perspective, I
2 comments
Read more

If it Fits the Narrative, Tweet it

We are currently on day 10 of pretending that America's southern border is comparable to the Holocaust. A narrative that seems to have emerged from nothing more than the left and the media's compulsion to defend Alexandria Ocasio Cortez's every statement, no matter how asinine. This story would be irrelevant by now if AOC had just abandoned her original statement, identifying it as a misstep. Instead, she insists upon digging herself deeper into this hole every day, encouraged by the unwavering support of the mainstream media and assorted blue checkmarks on Twitter.  In response to the backlash to her statement that the U.S. has been running concentration camps on its border, AOC and supporters utilized two defenses: She actually wasn't referring to the Holocaust when invoking concentration camps, and also   she was correct to compare the Holocaust to the U.S. border. If these two arguments seem contradictory and mutually exclusive, it's because they are. 
1 comment
Read more

Kyle Kashuv and Harvard: A Hill Worth Dying on

A piece of this week’s breaking news: 16-year-old boy said disgusting and idiotic things to friends who were also saying disgusting and idiotic things in order to prove that he was capable of saying the most disgusting and idiotic thing.  Earth shattering. Now I don’t mean to downplay the legitimate idiocy and disgustingness of the words that Kyle Kashuv used in his and his friends’ private Google Doc. The language is gross. I don’t need to go into detail explaining why he shouldn’t have said those words or why I don’t use that type of language because not only is it obvious, but it isn’t even a point of contention in this discussion. Because everyone is already in absolute agreement that the N-word is a terrible, hideous word with an even worse history, including Kyle. And that’s actually the point.  Kyle has apologized for his private messages multiple times. He brought more attention to the messages by apologizing publicly before the story gained a significant amount of a
1 comment
Read more