Skip to main content

You Purchase it, You Pay for it

A radical concept: if you take out a loan, you have to pay it off. 

Well, it’s a radical concept to the far-left presidential candidates anyway. Bernie Sanders came out swinging this morning on Twitter, arguing that all 1.6 trillion dollars of student debt in the U.S. should be forgiven.

One of my personal favorites:
 There's quite a bit to unpack in this gem of a tweet, so let's dig right into it.

Yes, I am free. I'm free even if I graduate with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. The same way that I'm free when I go to the grocery store and buy a candy bar for a dollar. When I make purchases by my own free-will, by definition, I am free. Even if those purchases put me in a huge amount of debt. 

When you are free, you have the ability to make decisions for yourself. You don't have freedom from the consequences of those actions.

I am still free even if my debt prevents me from "pursuing my dream". When you voluntarily incur a debt, you are responsible for the consequences that accompany the payment of that debt.

Additionally, college is supposed to be a financial investment. Those with the "dream" of becoming doctors pay the high price tag for medical school knowing that their investment will be profitable and they will easily be able to pay off their debt. If you "don't make enough to cover student loan payments", maybe you should have thought about that before you made a poor investment by going to a university that you cannot afford and majoring in a subject that doesn't pay.

I will graduate with my bachelor's with no debt. I chose to attend a cheap university and got the vast majority of my tuition and room and board paid for via scholarships, even if it meant that I wouldn't be attending my "dream school". Because of this, it irks me when college students act as if they had no option other than to attend a university that cost them $200,000+. A significant portion of college students made financially responsible decisions similar to mine. Should students like this be punished and forced to subsidize the education of those who made a careless investment?

Bernie closes out this masterpiece of a tweet by proclaiming, "there is no freedom without economic freedom". This seems ironic coming from a socialist, but when Bernie says economic freedom he isn't talking about the freedom to use the products of your labor however you please. He means freedom from the consequences of your actions. A type of freedom that is only possible if the government interferes with somebody else's actual economic freedom by forcing them to use their property to pay for a debt that they didn't sign on to.

If you purchased it, pay for it. It's not that complicated.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Narrative First, Facts Second

If it fits the narrative too perfectly, it probably didn't happen. This is a lesson that the American media should've learned during the Covington Catholic hoax back in January, and then again during the Jussie Smollett hoax in February. Yet once again, the mainstream media has demonstrated its inability to resist reporting on just about anything that supports their desired narrative. Over the weekend, Erica Thomas, a black Georgia lawmaker, posted a video to her Facebook account. In this video, she shared a story claiming that a white man had berated her in a grocery store for having more than 10 items in an express checkout line. In tears, she described how the man told her to "go back where you came from." It took less than a day for this to become a national story, the New York Times reporting on it with the headline, "'The Hate is Real': Black Georgia Lawmaker Berated at Supermarket." This story emerged a week after President Trump sent hi...

Overcoming the Strawman

"I am a Conservative." Until very recently, this is a statement that I felt particularly uncomfortable making. In the past year, my political ideology has become an important part of my identity, and yet I still found myself struggling to share this with my closest friends. When you're a nineteen-year-old girl, there is a lot of incentive to be a Liberal. All of your favorite celebrities agree with you, you get to wear those cute feminist t-shirts that every brand seems to be making, and it feels like everyone else your age agrees with your ideology. There is simply something trendy about being a young Liberal. Being a young Conservative female isn't nearly as fashionable.  The current staple in Conservative fashion is a bright red MAGA hat, an accessory that likely won't become popular amongst 19-year-old girls any time soon. It sometimes feels as if you're an outsider among peers of your own age and gender. The feeling of being the uncool, odd man ou...

Defining a Flag, Defining a Nation

Earlier this week, Nike canceled the release of a patriotic pair of shoes decorated with the Betsy Ross flag. This decision was the result of Colin Kaepernick, a Nike brand ambassador, informing the company that he and others found the shoe offensive, due to the inclusion of the Betsy Ross flag which was flown during the time of slavery in the United States. Kaepernick claimed that several racist groups had co-opted the flag, using it as a way to honor a time where slavery was commonplace.  Amid the controversy surrounding Nike's decision, the obvious question emerged: Is the Betsy Ross flag really a symbol of racism?  If you asked Colin Kaepernick, the answer would be a resounding "yes". This flag flew over a country where African-Americans were considered to be less than human and were owned as property.  The Betsy Ross flag is a symbol of the evils that the United States participated in at the time that it was flown.  While I understand this perspectiv...